United States v. Poole
This text of 224 F. App'x 413 (United States v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Matthew Poole pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), he received an enhanced sentence of 180 months of imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release.
Poole argues that the district court erred in counting his four prior burglary convictions as separate offenses for purposes of § 924(e). The district court did not so err. See United States v. White, 465 F.3d 250, 253 (5th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1167, — L.Ed.2d - (2007); United States v. Medina-Gutierrez, 980 F.2d 980, 982-83 (5th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 F. App'x 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-poole-ca5-2007.