United States v. Pomare
Opinion
Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare (“Rodriguez”) in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
213 F. App'x 901 (United States v. Pomare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.