United States v. POLLER

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedJanuary 28, 2026
Docket202400425
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. POLLER (United States v. POLLER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. POLLER, (N.M. 2026).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, HARRELL, and KORN Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Chase R. POLLER Hospital Corpsman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202400425

Decided: 28 January 2026

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Andrea K. Lockhart

Sentence adjudged 22 August 2024 by a general court-martial tried at Naval Base San Diego, California. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 17 years, forfeiture of all pay and al- lowances, and a dishonorable discharge.

For Appellant: Major Joshua Keefe, USMC

For Appellee: Captain Jacob Carmin, USMC Lieutenant Colonel Allison Acosta, USMC United States v. Poller, NMCCA No. 202400425 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM:

A general court-martial convicted Appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of re- ceiving, possessing, distributing and producing child pornography in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. 1 Appellant personally assigns one error and asks us to affirm only 12 years of his adjudged 17 year sentence to confinement. 2 After careful consideration of the record and the matters raised personally by Appel- lant, 3 we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights oc- curred. 4

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 10 U.S.C. §934.

2 Raised pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982):

WHETHER APPELLANT’S SENTENCE TO SEVENTEEN YEARS’ CONFINEMENT IS INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE. 3 See United States v. Matias, 25 M.J. 356 (C.M.A. 1987).

4 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Grostefon
12 M.J. 431 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Matias
25 M.J. 356 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. POLLER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-poller-nmcca-2026.