United States v. POLLER
This text of United States v. POLLER (United States v. POLLER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, HARRELL, and KORN Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Chase R. POLLER Hospital Corpsman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202400425
Decided: 28 January 2026
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Andrea K. Lockhart
Sentence adjudged 22 August 2024 by a general court-martial tried at Naval Base San Diego, California. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 17 years, forfeiture of all pay and al- lowances, and a dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant: Major Joshua Keefe, USMC
For Appellee: Captain Jacob Carmin, USMC Lieutenant Colonel Allison Acosta, USMC United States v. Poller, NMCCA No. 202400425 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM:
A general court-martial convicted Appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of re- ceiving, possessing, distributing and producing child pornography in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. 1 Appellant personally assigns one error and asks us to affirm only 12 years of his adjudged 17 year sentence to confinement. 2 After careful consideration of the record and the matters raised personally by Appel- lant, 3 we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights oc- curred. 4
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 10 U.S.C. §934.
2 Raised pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982):
WHETHER APPELLANT’S SENTENCE TO SEVENTEEN YEARS’ CONFINEMENT IS INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE. 3 See United States v. Matias, 25 M.J. 356 (C.M.A. 1987).
4 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. POLLER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-poller-nmcca-2026.