United States v. Pollard

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 2023
Docket23-30233
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Pollard (United States v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pollard, (5th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

Case: 23-30233 Document: 00516932634 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 23-30233 FILED Summary Calendar October 16, 2023 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Donald Leonard Pollard, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:21-CR-251-1 ______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Donald Leonard Pollard, Jr., pleaded guilty to count 3 of a five-count indictment charging him with distribution of methamphetamine, and he was sentenced to a 300-month term of imprisonment and to a five-year period of supervised release.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-30233 Document: 00516932634 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2023

No. 23-30233

At sentencing, the district court overruled Pollard’s objection to consideration of the conduct underlying the dismissed counts 1, 2, 4, and 5 as relevant conduct in determining the drug quantity. Pollard was ultimately sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and he has appealed his sentence. Pollard contends that the district court erred in its relevant-conduct finding. We have not reached this question because any error was harmless. Pollard’s offense level was determined on the basis of his career-offender designation, which did not depend upon the court’s relevant conduct finding. See United States v. Bams, 858 F.3d 937, 948-49 (5th Cir. 2017). The judgment is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for the limited purposed of correcting the judgment to list the correct statute of conviction. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; see also 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henry Bams
858 F.3d 937 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Pollard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pollard-ca5-2023.