United States v. Pollard

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 1, 2005
• Docket: 05-4101
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4101

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT DENARD POLLARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-207)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 1, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert Denard Pollard appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four

months of imprisonment. Pollard claims that the sentence imposed

by the district court was unreasonable. We have reviewed the

record and conclude that Pollard’s sentence is within the statutory

maximum sentencing range, and the district court’s revocation

proceedings otherwise comported with due process. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583 (2000). Moreover, we conclude sentencing Pollard to the

maximum term permitted by statute was not unreasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -