United States v. Polite

35 F. 58, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88
District Court, D. South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1888·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The defendants are before the court on an information tiled by the district attorney for violating section 5399, Rev. St., impeding a witness. Accompanying the information are the papers of the commissioner who held the preliminary examination, including the sworn testimony of the witnesses taken in the presence of the accused. The information sets out that it is on the oath of office of the district attorney; but it is not sworn to. The defendants’ motion is based upon the absence of an affidavit to the information. It is true that informations must he based upon affidavits which show probable cause arising from facts within the knowledge of the parties making them, and that mere belief is not sufficient. U. S. v. Tureaud, 20 Fed. Rep. 621. In the case at bar, the defendants were arrested on a warrant issued upon an affidavit stating facts on knowledge. They were brought before the commissioner, a committing magistrate. The evidence against them was taken on oath. Thus all the requirements of the law were fulfilled. Bradley, J., in Instructions to Commissioners, 3 Woods, 502. Upon this sworn testimony the information was filed. The motion to quash is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Polite, 35 F. 58, 1888 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88 (D.S.C. 1888).

35 F. 58 (United States v. Polite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. McDonald
293 F. 433 (D. Minnesota, 1923)
United States v. Illig
288 F. 939 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1920)
United States v. Alamo
12 P.R. Fed. 108 (D. Puerto Rico, 1920)
Weeks v. United States
216 F. 292 (Second Circuit, 1914)
State v. Gottlieb
129 N.W. 460 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
United States v. Baumert
179 F. 735 (N.D. New York, 1910)
Salter v. State
1909 OK CR 75 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1909)
Rider v. United States
149 F. 164 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
United States v. Dana
68 F. 886 (S.D. New York, 1895)
Lustig v. People
18 Colo. 217 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1893)