United States v. Plys

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Plys

22 C.M.A. 374

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 1973

DocketNo. 26,677

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 374 (United States v. Plys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Plys, 22 C.M.A. 374 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).

Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).

Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-plys-cma-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack