United States v. Plys

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Plys

22 C.M.A. 374

United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 22, 1973·No. No. 26,677·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).

Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).

Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).

United States v. Plys, 22 C.M.A. 374 (cma 1973).

Pincite

22 C.M.A. 374 (United States v. Plys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related