United States v. Pluria Rice
This text of 52 F.3d 331 (United States v. Pluria Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 331
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Pluria RICE, Appellant.
No. 94-3706MN
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 11, 1995
Filed: Apr. 27, 1995
Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
After pleading guilty to a drug-related offense, Pluria Rice appeals her guidelines sentence. Rice contends she was entitled to an order compelling the Government to move for a substantial assistance departure. We disagree. Rice did not show the Government breached the written plea agreement or unconstitutionally withheld the motion. See United States v. Kelly, 18 F.3d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir. 1994). Rice's remaining arguments are foreclosed by the court's contrary holdings in United States v. Wheeler, 972 F.2d 927, 929 (8th Cir. 1992), and United States v. Clary, 34 F.3d 709, 713-14 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1172 (1995). We affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pluria-rice-ca8-1995.