United States v. Pletschke
This text of United States v. Pletschke (United States v. Pletschke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2310
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KRIS PLETSCHKE, d/b/a Raw Health,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-03-214-1)
Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 29, 2005
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kris Pletschke, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Josephs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kris Pletschke appeals the district court’s order
entering default judgment against him. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pletschke,
No. CA-03-214-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Pletschke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pletschke-ca4-2005.