United States v. Pitts

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 2003
Docket02-7765
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Pitts (United States v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pitts, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7765

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN CALVIN PITTS, a/k/a Johnny Pitts,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-70)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 10, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Calvin Pitts, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Calvin Pitts appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Pitts, No. CR-98-70

(E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Pitts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pitts-ca4-2003.