United States v. Pitts

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Pitts

55 F. App'x 676

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2003·No. No. 02-7765·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Calvin Pitts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pitts, No. CR-98-70 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

[677]*677i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Calvin Pitts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pitts, No. CR-98-70 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

[677]*677i

United States v. Pitts, 55 F. App'x 676 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 676 (United States v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.