United States v. Piszcz
76 M.J. 65, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 21
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 17, 2017
DocketNo. 16-0741/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 65 (United States v. Piszcz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Piszcz, 76 M.J. 65, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 21 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20140842. On further consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that the Order of January 13, 2017, denying the petition for grant of review is hereby vacated, and that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:
I.WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS A CMCR JUDGE TERMINATED THE MILITARY COMMISSION OF JUDGE HERRING.
II.WHETHER, AS AN APPOINTED JUDGE OF THE CMCR, JUDGE HERRING DID NOT MEET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGE.
III.WHETHER THE ASSIGNMENT OF INFERIOR OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS TO A SINGLE JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE. .
No briefs will be filed under Rule 26.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 65, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-piszcz-armfor-2017.