United States v. Pinkela
74 M.J. 358, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 577
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 22, 2015·No. No. 15-0330/AR·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CCA 20120649. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO FIND BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED AGGRAVATED ASSAULT AND RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 128 AND 134, UCMJ, BY ENGAGING IN UNPROTECTED SEX WHILE HIV-POSITIVE.
The decision of the Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated and the record of Trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for reconsideration in light of United States v. Gutierrez, 74 M.J. 61 (C.A.A.F.2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Pinkela, 74 M.J. 358, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 577 (Ark. 2015).
74 M.J. 358 (United States v. Pinkela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Lieutenant Colonel KENNETH A.R. PINKELA
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2016