United States v. Pineda-Moreno
617 F.3d 1120, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16708, 2010 WL 3169573
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 12, 2010·No. 08-30385·Published·Cited by 41 cases
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Chief Judge Kozinski; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt.
ORDER
Judges O’Scannlain and N.R. Smith have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wolle has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused [1121]*1121active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Pineda-Moreno, 617 F.3d 1120, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16708, 2010 WL 3169573 (9th Cir. 2010).
617 F.3d 1120 (United States v. Pineda-Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Almonor
120 N.E.3d 1183 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2019)
Fortino Alvarez v. Randy Tracy
773 F.3d 1011 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Harry Katzin
769 F.3d 163 (Third Circuit, 2014)
State v. Bobby L. Tate
2014 WI 89 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2014)
In re United States for an Order Pursuant
42 F. Supp. 3d 511 (S.D. New York, 2014)
United States v. Cordae Black
750 F.3d 1053 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Iev, Juvenile Male
705 F.3d 430 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito Estrella
286 P.3d 150 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012)
United States v. Oladosu
887 F. Supp. 2d 437 (D. Rhode Island, 2012)
State v. Dykes
728 S.E.2d 455 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Pitt
29 Mass. L. Rptr. 445 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2012)
Montana State Fund v. Simms
2012 MT 22 (Montana Supreme Court, 2012)
United States v. Jones
132 S. Ct. 945 (Supreme Court, 2012)
In re United States
809 F. Supp. 2d 113 (E.D. New York, 2011)
In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless Telephone
849 F. Supp. 2d 526 (D. Maryland, 2011)
United States v. Narrl
789 F. Supp. 2d 645 (D. South Carolina, 2011)
United States v. Cotterman
637 F.3d 1068 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Walker
771 F. Supp. 2d 803 (W.D. Michigan, 2011)
United States v. Sparks
750 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D. Massachusetts, 2010)
Foltz v. Commonwealth
698 S.E.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2010)