United States v. Pineda-Diaz

63 F. App'x 404

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2003
• Docket: No. 02-50110; D.C. No. CR-01-00014-AHS
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Raul Pineda-Diaz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pineda-Diaz’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pineda-Diaz has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.