United States v. Pierre Watson

596 F. App'x 526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Pierre Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 843 F.3d 335
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2015·No. 14-3265·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While Pierre Watson was serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court 1 that he had violated several release conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 8 months in prison and 48 months of additional supervised release. On appeal, Watson contends that the court abused its discretion by failing to articulate its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review); United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 943-44 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pierre Watson, 596 F. App'x 526 (8th Cir. 2015).

596 F. App'x 526 (United States v. Pierre Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gray
533 F.3d 942 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Miller
557 F.3d 910 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)