United States v. Pierre Curtin Dozois

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Pierre Curtin Dozois

438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11521

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1971

Docket26116_1

StatusPublished

This text of 438 F.2d 531 (United States v. Pierre Curtin Dozois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Pierre Curtin Dozois, 438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11521 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from his conviction and sentence of possession of stolen government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We affirm.

Appellant complains that the court’s supplemental instructions were erroneous; that the court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial after the court excluded a government exhibit and related evidence; and finally that it was plain error for the court to omit instructions as to the effect of appellant’s character evidence. We find no error.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from his conviction and sentence of possession of stolen government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We affirm.

Appellant complains that the court’s supplemental instructions were erroneous; that the court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial after the court excluded a government exhibit and related evidence; and finally that it was plain error for the court to omit instructions as to the effect of appellant’s character evidence. We find no error.

Judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 531, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pierre-curtin-dozois-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack