United States v. Pierre

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Pierre

687 F. App'x 880

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 5, 2017·No. No. 15-13182 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Gailey, appointed counsel for Es-pere Pierre, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to with[881] draw is GRANTED, and Pierre’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Gailey, appointed counsel for Es-pere Pierre, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to with[881] draw is GRANTED, and Pierre’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Pierre, 687 F. App'x 880 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

687 F. App'x 880 (United States v. Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related