United States v. Pierce

120 F. App'x 107

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: January 13, 2005
• Docket: No. 03-10382
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Rickey Lane Pierce appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to correct restitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pierce contends, inter alia, that his motion to correct the restitution amount under 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3) was not procedurally improper. Because section 3572 does not offer Pierce an avenue for relief, the district court did not err.

AFFIRMED.¹

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1 . All pending motions are denied.