United States v. Pico

Supreme Court

United States v. Pico

63 U.S. 406

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 U.S. 406 (United States v. Pico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Pico, 63 U.S. 406 (1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of California.

The appellee presented to the board of commissioners a claim.for eleven square leagues of land, known by the name Moquelamos, situate in the county of Calaveras, California. The board rejected the claim; but, on appeal to the District Court, and the production of some further proof, that court affirmed it.

The preliminary proceedings required by the regulations of 1828, before a grant of the public lands, were not produced, if any existed. The only evidence off the title is a grant of the tract by a formal title to the claimant, 'dated Los Angeles, 6th June, 1846, sigued by the Governor, Pio Pico, and J. M. Moreno, the Secretary of State, and two other papers, relied on as furnishing proof that the grant was approved by the Departmental Assembly. One of them in a certificate to that effect of the Governor and Secretary, bearing date 15th J une, 1846; the other purports to be a communication from N. Botello, deputy secretary of the Departmental Assembly, of the approval, to Moreno, Secretary of State, for the information of the Governor. This approval, according to the deputy secretary of the Assembly, was in a session held on the 15th July, 1846. The paper was found among the Mexican archives.

[416]*416The other documents — the grant and certificate of approval— came from the hands of the claimant. No record of them was found among the Mexican archives or in any book, nor is there any evidence of possession or occupation deserving notice or consideration.

• The case falls within the principles and is governed by the views of the court in the case of the United States v. Teschmaker and others, decided at this term. Besides the suspicious character of the grant, it appears to be wholly destitute of meric.

The decree below reversed, and the case remanded for farther evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of California.

The appellee presented to the board of commissioners a claim.for eleven square leagues of land, known by the name Moquelamos, situate in the county of Calaveras, California. The board rejected the claim; but, on appeal to the District Court, and the production of some further proof, that court affirmed it.

The preliminary proceedings required by the regulations of 1828, before a grant of the public lands, were not produced, if any existed. The only evidence off the title is a grant of the tract by a formal title to the claimant, 'dated Los Angeles, 6th June, 1846, sigued by the Governor, Pio Pico, and J. M. Moreno, the Secretary of State, and two other papers, relied on as furnishing proof that the grant was approved by the Departmental Assembly. One of them in a certificate to that effect of the Governor and Secretary, bearing date 15th J une, 1846; the other purports to be a communication from N. Botello, deputy secretary of the Departmental Assembly, of the approval, to Moreno, Secretary of State, for the information of the Governor. This approval, according to the deputy secretary of the Assembly, was in a session held on the 15th July, 1846. The paper was found among the Mexican archives.

[416]*416The other documents — the grant and certificate of approval— came from the hands of the claimant. No record of them was found among the Mexican archives or in any book, nor is there any evidence of possession or occupation deserving notice or consideration.

• The case falls within the principles and is governed by the views of the court in the case of the United States v. Teschmaker and others, decided at this term. Besides the suspicious character of the grant, it appears to be wholly destitute of meric.

The decree below reversed, and the case remanded for farther evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 U.S. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pico-scotus-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack