United States v. Pickel
Opinion
[729]*729DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
This case is again before us upon order of the Court of Military Appeals, 4 M.J. 106 (C.M.A.1977), which reversed our decision and dismissed specifictions 3-5 and 7-9 of the Charge.
The accused was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone, and, pursuant to his pleas, was convicted of nine specifications alleging use, sale, transfer and possession of amphetamines and marijuana, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. The approved sentence extended to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of $240.00 per month for 12 months and reduction to airman basic. In our initial decision, United States v. Pickel, 3 M.J. 501 (A.F.C.M.R.1977), we set aside the findings of guilty of Specifications 2 and 6 of the Charge for lack of jurisdiction and reassessed the sentence to include a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for ten months, forfeiture of $240.00 per month for ten months and reduction to airman basic.1 The net result of appellate action has been to reduce the original nine specifications to one.
Reassessing the sentence on the basis of the one remaining specification, we find appropriate only so much as provides for a bad conduct discharge and reduction to airman basic.
The findings of guilty of specification 1 and the Charge, and the sentence, as modified, are
AFFIRMED.
FORAY, Judge, concurs.
HERMAN, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 M.J. 728 (United States v. Pickel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.