United States v. Piccolo

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-10577 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-04-00083-

FRAZER SCOTT PICCOLO,  LRH/PAL Defendant-Appellant. District of Nevada, Las Vegas

 ORDER

Filed April 20, 2006

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John R. Gibson,* and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed April 3, 2006, slip op. 3655, is hereby amended as follows:

1. Third line of slip op. 3666, before “United States v. Bryant ” add the following: “United States v. Thomas, 361 F.3d 653, 657-60 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (concluding under a categorical approach that “the offense of escape is a crime of violence within the meaning of . . . § 4B1.2(a)”), vacated and remanded, 543 U.S. 1111 (2005) (remanding in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005));”

*The Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

4416 UNITED STATES v. PICCOLO 2. Fourth line from the bottom of slip op. 3666, delete “Our view is that the powder-keg “approach taken by the other circuits proves too much.” United States v. Thomas, 333 F.3d 280, 282 (D.C. Cir. 2003).” Add “In our view, the powder-keg rationale adopted by other circuits proves too much.”

3. Third line of slip op. 3667, delete “See Thomas, 333 F.3d at 283 (distinguishing the case of “[a] prisoner not returning to a halfway house,” which “may not inherently create a risk of harm to others”);” Add: “See”.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.