United States v. Phillips
This text of 630 F. App'x 137 (United States v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT ORDER
After considering the contentions raised by appellant, to-wit, that the District Court erred abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s emergency motion to stay enforcement of the court’s preliminary order of forfeiture for substitute asset.
On consideration whereof and in light of our disposition of United States v. Phillips, 589 Fed.Appx. 64 (3d Cir.2014) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2911, 192 L.Ed.2d 941 (2015), it is now here ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the said District Court entered July 25, 2013, be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 F. App'x 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-phillips-ca3-2016.