United States v. Phillips

73 M.J. 408, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 665
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Phillips. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 M.J. 161
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. 14-0199/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20120585. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ACCEPTING APPELLANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY TO DISOBEYING THE ORDER OF HIS COMMANDER IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 90, UCMJ, WHEN THE ULTIMATE OFFENSE AT ISSUE WAS THE MINOR OFFENSE OF BREAKING RESTRICTION DESCRIBED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, AND THE RECORD DOES NOT REFLECT APPELLANT’S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ORDER IMPOSING RESTRICTION WAS ISSUED WITH THE FULL AUTHORITY OF HIS COMMANDER’S OFFICE TO LIFT THE DUTY IN THE PARLANCE OF THIS COURT’S EARLIER OPINION, “ABOVE THE COMMON RUCK.”

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phillips, 73 M.J. 408, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 665 (Ark. 2014).

73 M.J. 408 (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.