United States v. Phillip Lee Peterson
459 F.2d 1389, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9415
Opinion
The appellant, convicted of bank robbery and sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act, appeals. Neither of his two contentions are meritorious.
The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying a requested continuance and, since the prosecution produced testimony that Peterson participated in a conversation in which the robbery was planned, the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment of conviction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Phillip Lee Peterson, 459 F.2d 1389, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9415 (9th Cir. 1972).
459 F.2d 1389 (United States v. Phillip Lee Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James M. Albert
773 F.2d 386 (First Circuit, 1985)