United States v. Phillip Killian

767 F.2d 698, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1985
Docket84-2514
StatusPublished

This text of 767 F.2d 698 (United States v. Phillip Killian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Phillip Killian, 767 F.2d 698, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923 (10th Cir. 1985).

Opinions

[699]*699ORDER AND JUDGMENT

In accordance with 10th Cir.R. 9(e) and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), this appeal came on for consideration on the briefs and record on appeal.

This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant’s renewed application for bail pending appeal pursuant to Fed.R. App.P. 9(b). In the interest of justice, we partially remand the matter to the district court for reconsideration of defendant’s application for release pending appeal under the standards announced by our decision in United States v. Affleck, 765 F.2d 944, (10th Cir.1985). Accordingly, the matter is partially remanded for such further proceedings as are appropriate. See 10th Cir.R. 17(b).

Upon the conclusion of the proceedings contemplated by this order, the district court shall promptly certify the record of the proceedings as a supplemental record. Further, the parties shall, within ten days of the transmittal of the supplemental record on appeal, furnish statements of their respective positions regarding the proceedings on remand.

The partial mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 F.2d 698, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-phillip-killian-ca10-1985.