United States v. Phillip James Soffos

67 F.3d 298, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32339, 1995 WL 581163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Phillip James Soffos. Read the opinion of the Court — 993 F.2d 1541
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 1995·No. 95-6762·Unpublished

Opinion

67 F.3d 298

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Phillip James SOFFOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6762.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 21, 1995.
Decided: October 4, 1995.

Phillip James Soffos, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Soffos, Nos. CR-91-320-S; CA-95-1112-S (D.Md. Apr. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phillip James Soffos, 67 F.3d 298, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32339, 1995 WL 581163 (4th Cir. 1995).

67 F.3d 298 (United States v. Phillip James Soffos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.