United States v. Philip Morris USA
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
V. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (PLF)
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER #133 —- REMAND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has previously set forth procedures for the review and disposition of the documents stored in the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository (“the Depository”). See Memorandum Opinion and Order #119 — Remand [Dkt. No. 6479]; Memorandum Opinion and Order #120 — Remand [Dkt. No. 6480]. For a specific subset of documents — the Chambers’ Files from Judge Fitzpatrick’s chambers in the Minnesota litigation (“Chambers’ Files”) — the Court ordered the defendants and non-party entities to “securely transmit to the Court copies of all documents that have been designated as privileged or otherwise shielded from public disclosure for in camera review.” Memorandum Opinion and Order #1 20 — Remand [Dkt. No. 6480] at 2. The entities have since produced to the Court the documents that have been designated as privileged or shielded from public disclosure, as well as corresponding privilege
logs. See Notice of Filing Certain Privilege Logs in Response to Orders #119 and #120-Remand [Dkt. No. 6483]. It is hereby ORDERED that the in camera review of the Chambers’ Files documents is
referred to Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya for a report and recommendations, if necessary, about the appropriate disposition of the remaining documents, including whether any documents
previously designated as privileged or otherwise shielded from public disclosure are appropriate
for public disclosure. \
O40 Aft —
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
SO ORDERED.
DATE: la | [23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Philip Morris USA (United States v. Philip Morris USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.