United States v. Philip Morris USA

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 27, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 1999-2496·Published

Opinion

APPENDIX B

Corrective Statements – Implementation Details

Cigarette Box Onserts • Ease with which consumers can access, unfold, and review the onsert • Placement of text on the front of the insert versus inside a folded onsert • Size of the onsert (unfolded and folded) • Size, font, and color of the headline • Size, color and font of the text on the inside panel(s) • Color of background • Should the statements be translated into and published in Spanish as well?

TV ads • Size, color, and font of the on-screen text • Background color • How much text on-screen at a time • Length of time each set of text stays on the screen • Quality and volume of the announcer’s voice • Rate at which the announcer speaks

Websites • Where the corrective statements are displayed on the websites • Size, color, and font of the on-screen text • Background color • How much text is on each page of the site • Should the statements be available in Spanish?

Newspapers • Size, color, and font of the text • Relative sizes of the headline, body text, and tagline • Background color • Layout • Schedule for publication • Should the court require the defendants to publish the ads in the online versions of the newspapers as well?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Philip Morris USA, (D.D.C. 2012).

United States v. Philip Morris USA (United States v. Philip Morris USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.