United States v. Philip Ketter

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 23, 2023
• Docket: 23-6002
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6002 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PHILIP KETTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Ketter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6002 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Philip Ketter appeals the district court’s order denying Ketter’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36

motion. We have conducted a de novo review of the record and find no reversible error.

See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing standard

of review for Rule 36 motion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Ketter, No. 3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 12,

2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED