United States v. Philip G. Striano

434 F.2d 1041
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 1970
Docket35076
StatusPublished

This text of 434 F.2d 1041 (United States v. Philip G. Striano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Philip G. Striano, 434 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

434 F.2d 1041

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Philip G. STRIANO, Appellant.

No. 341.

Docket 35076.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued December 11, 1970.

Decided December 11, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Morris E. Lasker, Judge.

David V. Keegan, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, and John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Henry B. Rothblatt, New York City, for appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, CLARIE, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

We affirm, in open court, Philip G. Striano's conviction for violation of the counterfeiting laws, 18 U.S.C. § 472, as the defense of entrapment presented only a question of fact which was decided by the jury in accordance with a concededly correct charge by the district judge.

The members of the panel have examined the reports of the Secret Service, which were marked Court's Exhibit A, and find that there was no error in the trial judge's refusal to permit defense counsel to inspect these reports.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F.2d 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-philip-g-striano-ca2-1970.