United States v. Phelps

107 U.S. 320, 2 S. Ct. 389, 27 L. Ed. 505, 17 Otto 320, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1222
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 26, 1883·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*323 Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

Section 2928 of the Revised Statutes, a re-enactment of sect. 21 of the act of March 1, 1823, c. 21, relates alone to merchandise taken from a wreck, and does not in any manner affect the proceedings under sect. 2927, a ré-enactmént of sect. 52 of the act of March 2, 1799, c. 22, to obtain an appraisement for an abatement of duties on account of damages to goods during the voyage of. importation. What -was said in Shelton v. The Collector, 5 Wall. 113, 118, to the contrary of this is disapproved. The subject is so fully and carefully considered in the opinion of the court below, that we deem it unnecessary to do more than to refer to the report of the case in 20 Blatchf. 129.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phelps, 107 U.S. 320, 2 S. Ct. 389, 27 L. Ed. 505, 17 Otto 320, 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1222 (1883).

107 U.S. 320 (United States v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.
285 U.S. 393 (Supreme Court, 1932)
United States v. Phelps
27 F. Cas. 523 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1879)