United States v. Phelps
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 25, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 05-50119 Summary Calendar _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES PHELPS, JR., also known as Mr. D, also known as Dave Smith,
Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-197-6 __________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given in its order dated
January 4, 2005. The court there found that Charles Phelps Jr. failed to prove that he owned an
interest in the forfeited property. That finding is supported by the evidence and is free of error.
Any pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Phelps (United States v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.