United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Company

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 768 F.3d 662 →

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided November 19, 2014·No. 13-2436·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 19, 2014

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

Nos. 13‐2436 & 13‐2441

UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA, Appeals from the United States Plaintiff‐Appellee, District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. v. P.H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and No. 1:10‐cv‐00910‐WCG NCR CORPORATION, Defendants‐Appellants. William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on September 25, 2014 is hereby AMENDED as follows:

On page 30 of the opinion, line 25 is corrected to read “government estimates ranged from “roughly 58,000 to 85,000” kg.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 19, 2014

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

Nos. 13‐2436 & 13‐2441

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on September 25, 2014 is hereby AMENDED as follows:

On page 30 of the opinion, line 25 is corrected to read “government estimates ranged from “roughly 58,000 to 85,000” kg.

United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Company, (7th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Company (United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.