United States v. Peyton Maurice Daughtry, Myrtle Ray Matthews

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Peyton Maurice Daughtry, Myrtle Ray Matthews

405 F.2d 887

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 1969·No. 12910_1·Published

Opinion

405 F.2d 887

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
v.
Peyton Maurice DAUGHTRY, Myrtle Ray Matthews, Appellants.

No. 12910.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 1969.
Decided Feb. 7, 1969.

Stedman Hines, Greensboro, N.C. (Court-appointed counsel) on brief for appellants.

William Medford, U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the questions raised on appeal we are of the opinion that they are wholly without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

405 F.2d 887

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
v.
Peyton Maurice DAUGHTRY, Myrtle Ray Matthews, Appellants.

No. 12910.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 1969.
Decided Feb. 7, 1969.

Stedman Hines, Greensboro, N.C. (Court-appointed counsel) on brief for appellants.

William Medford, U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the questions raised on appeal we are of the opinion that they are wholly without merit.

Affirmed.

United States v. Peyton Maurice Daughtry, Myrtle Ray Matthews, 405 F.2d 887 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

405 F.2d 887 (United States v. Peyton Maurice Daughtry, Myrtle Ray Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.