United States v. Petty

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 5, 2005
• Docket: 05-6011
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT W. PETTY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR- 97-107-DKC; CA-03-1311-8-DKC)

Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Petty, Appellant Pro Se. Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Petty seeks to appeal from the district court’s

order denying various pending motions and directing him to clarify

the claims on which he wished to proceed in the district court.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Petty

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -