United States v. Peterson
This text of 68 F. App'x 84 (United States v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Dennis Eugene Peterson appeals his conviction and sentence for seven counts of [85]*85production, distribution, and possession of child pornography by means of a computer. He argues that the trial court should have suppressed evidence because of alleged discovery, evidentiary, and Fourth Amendment violations. Peterson also asserts that the trial court miscalculated his offender score by improperly applying sentencing enhancements.
We have carefully considered the parties’ briefs and arguments, as well as the record of this case, and conclude that there was no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peterson-ca9-2003.