United States v. Peterson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 F.3d 385
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 18, 1999·No. 99-40355·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40355 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON LEWIS PETERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CR-40-2 - - - - - - - - - -

November 18, 1999

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Nelson Lewis Peterson has moved

for leave to withdraw and filed a motion and brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Peterson has not

filed a response to the instant motion. Our independent review

of the motion, brief, and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Peterson, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Peterson (United States v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)