United States v. Peterson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
John Anthony Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial and related motions. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 38. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Peterson, No. 4:07-er-00045-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
597 F. App'x 188 (United States v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.