United States v. Peters

3 U.S. 121, 1 L. Ed. 535, 3 Dall. 121, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 330
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedAugust 24, 1795
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 3 U.S. 121 (United States v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Peters, 3 U.S. 121, 1 L. Ed. 535, 3 Dall. 121, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 330 (1795).

Opinion

By the Court

:—We have consulted together on this motion ; and, though a difference of sentiment exists, a majority of the Court are clearly of opinion, that the motion ought to be granted. Therefore,

Let a Prohibition issue;

The prohibition issued, accordingly, in the following form:

" United States, SS.
THEPREsiDENToftheÜNiTED States to the honorable Richard Peters, Efquire, Judge of the Diftridt Court of the United States, in and for the Pennfylvania. diftridt:, It is ihewn to the Judges of the Supreme Court of the United Statesj by Samuel B. Davis, That whereas by the laws of nations, and the treaties fubfifting between the United States and the Republic of France-, the trial of .prizes taken on the high feas, without the territorial limits and jurifdidtion of the United States, and brought within the dominions' and jurifdidtion of the faid Republic, for legal adjudication," by veffels of war belonging to the fovereignty of the faid' Republic, adting. under the f&me, and of all qiieftions incidental thereto, does of fight,' and exclufively, belong to the tribunals and judiciary eftabliih-ments of the faid Republic,, and to no' other tribunal, or tribunals, court, or. courts, whatfoever’: And whereas by the faid law of nations, and treaties aforefaid, the veflcls of war belonging to the faid French Republic, and .the .officers commanding' the fame, cannot, and ought not, to be arrefted, ' *130 feized, • attached, or detained, in the ports of the United States, by procefs of law, at the fuit or injiance .of individuals, to an-fwer for any capture or captures, feizure or fe.izures, made on the high feas, and brought for legal adjudication into the ports of the French Republic, by the faid veffsfs of war, while belonging to, and adding under the authority and in the immediate fervice of the faid Republic : And whereas bythe laws arid treaties aforefáid, the Diftrift Courts of the United States have not, and ought not, to entertain jurifdicnon or hold plea cf fuen captures, made as aforefnid, under the Aove circum-ftances: And whereas by the laws of nations, the veffels of war of belligerent powers, duly by them authorized, to cruize againft their enemies, and to make-prize cf their ftups and goods, may, in time of war, arreft and feize the veiTels belonging to the fubjefts or citizens of neutral nations, and bring them into the ports of the fovereign under whofe com tnifficn and authority they aft, there to anfwer for any breaches of the laws pf nations, concerning the navigation of neutral ihips, in time of war; and the faid veffels of war,, their-commanders, officers and crews, are not amenable before the tribunals of neutral powers for their conduft therein, but are only anfwerable to the- fovereign in whole immediate fervice they were, and from whom they derived their authority: And whereas, on or before-the twentieth day of May", now laft paft, the faid Samuel B. Davis, was, and now is, a Lieutenant of fhips in the navy of the faid French Republic,' and commander of a corvette, or veffel of war, called, the Cajfms, then, <fhd now, the property of the faid Republic, and in her immediate fer-vice ; and on the faid twentieth day of May, was duly com-rniffioned, by and under the Authority of théTaid Republic, to cruize againft her energies, and make prize of their iliips (as by his commiffion and the certificate of the minifter plenipp-ientiaiy of the laid Repuhlife to the United States, to the court fhewn, more fully appears) Nev-erthelefs a certain James Tara, of the city of Philadelphia,merchant, not ignorant of the pre-mifes, but-contriving and intending to difturb the peace and harmony fubfiftlng between the United States and the French Republic, and him, the faid Samuel B. Davis, wrongfully to aggrieve and opprefs,.and draw to another proof, him, the’ faid Samuel B.'Davis, and the faid corvette, or-veflel of war, of the French Republic, the Caffius, in the pofit of Philadelphia, under the protection'of the laws of nations, and-of the faith' of treaties, has, by procefs out ef the Diftricl Court of the United States, in and for the ‘Diftrift of PennfyLvania, attached and a’r-refted him, the faid Samuel B; JDayisi and'the {-¿dá-corvette, or veffel of war, the Gajjius, before the judge .of the faid Diftrift Court* contrary to the faid law, of nations, and treaties, and *131 against the due form of the laws of the United States, hath unjustly drawn in plea, to answer to a certain libel, by him, the said James Yard, against him, the said Samuel B. Davis, and against the said corvette, of vessel of war, the Cassius, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, exhibited and promoted, craftily and subtilly therein alledging, articulating, and objecting, that on the said twentieth day of May, now last past, the said Samuel B. Davis, then commander of the said corvette, or vessel, the Cassius did, forcibly, violently, and tortiously, take on the high feas, a certain Schooner, or vessel, belonging to the said James Yard, called the William Lindfey, and brought her into Port de Paix, (in the dominion of the French Republic) where she still remains; and also alledging and articulating, that the said corvette, or vessel called the Cassius, was originally equipped and fitted for war, in the port of Philadelphia, in the United States, and that the said Samuel B. Davis, was at the time of the said capture, and now is, a citizen of the United States : Without this, however, and the said James Yard, not in any manner alledging, or articulating, that the said capture was made, within the territory, rivers, or bays, of the United States, or within a marine league of the coast thereof, or that the said corvettt or vessel, the Cassius, was so fitted or equipped for war in the United States, by the said French Republic, her agent, or agents, with their knowledge, or by the means, or procurement, or by the said Samuel B. Davis, or that at the time of her being so equipped, or fitted for war, in the United States, (if ever there she was so in any manner fitted or equipped) she was the property of the said French Republic, or that the said Samuel B. Davis was in any manner, in the said equipment, or fitting for war, concerned; and without this, also, and the said James Yard, not in any manner alledging, that the said Samuel B. Davis was retained, or engaged, in the service of the French Republic, within the territory or jurisdiction of the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Janet Woodley
751 F.2d 1008 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Lucas Goar v. Compania Peruana De Vapores
688 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Ex Parte Republic of Peru
318 U.S. 578 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Ling v. 1,689 Tons of Coal Lying Aboard S. S. Wilhelmina
78 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Washington, 1942)
Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co.
164 F. 1 (Fourth Circuit, 1908)
People ex rel. Smith v. Doyle
28 Misc. 411 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
In Re Cooper
143 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Tapia v. Martinez
4 N.M. 165 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1888)
Ex Parte Phenix Insurance Company
118 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Smith v. Whitney
116 U.S. 167 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Willard v. Norris
2 Rawle 56 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1829)
The Divina Pastora
17 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1819)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 U.S. 121, 1 L. Ed. 535, 3 Dall. 121, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peters-scotus-1795.