United States v. Peterman
This text of United States v. Peterman (United States v. Peterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40026 Summary Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN FREDERICK PETERMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C:94-CV-228 (C:91-CR-233) - - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This is an appeal from the district court's order denying
appellant's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that the
district court erred in dismissing his claims on the basis of
procedural default. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Peterman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peterman-ca5-1995.