United States v. Peter Gabriel Talarico

952 F.2d 404, 1991 WL 269968
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 1991
Docket91-5828
StatusUnpublished

This text of 952 F.2d 404 (United States v. Peter Gabriel Talarico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Peter Gabriel Talarico, 952 F.2d 404, 1991 WL 269968 (6th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

952 F.2d 404

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Peter Gabriel TALARICO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-5828.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1991.

Before RALPH B. GUY, JR., and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and JAMES HARVEY, Senior District Judge*.

ORDER

This court entered an order on August 2, 1991, directing the appellant to show cause within twenty-one days why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because of a late notice of appeal. Appellant has failed to respond.

It appears from the documents before the court that the final order was entered October 26, 1989. The notice of appeal filed on March 12, 1991, was over one year late. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) and 26(a).

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. United States v. Hatfield, 815 F.2d 1068, 1073 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Willis, 804 F.2d 961, 963 n. 2 (6th Cir.1986). Fed.R.App.P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 8(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable James Harvey, U.S. Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William Willis
804 F.2d 961 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Richard Lee Hatfield
815 F.2d 1068 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
952 F.2d 404, 1991 WL 269968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peter-gabriel-talarico-ca6-1991.