United States v. Pete Junior Langley

453 F.2d 1254
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 1972·No. 71-1553·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pete Junior Langley is appealing his conviction for possession of a firearm in violation of the Gun Control Act, 18 U. S.C. App. § 1202(a). The Supreme Court has recently held that a conviction under this act can be sustained only if the government has proved that the possession of the firearm was in or affecting interstate commerce. United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336, 92 S.Ct. 515, 30 L.Ed.2d 488 (1971). Since the government did not prove that Langley’s possession of a firearm was in or affecting interstate commerce, we reverse his conviction on the authority of Bass.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pete Junior Langley, 453 F.2d 1254 (4th Cir. 1972).

453 F.2d 1254 (United States v. Pete Junior Langley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bass
404 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1971)