United States v. Perry

24 M.J. 557, 1987 CMR LEXIS 227
U.S. Army Court of Military Review·Decided April 9, 1987·No. ACMR 8601110·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Judge:

Appellant alleges and government agrees that the military judge erred in adjudging a sentence to forfeitures in excess of the statutory limits for a special court-martial. Appellant further alleges that the convening authority’s action which approves a forfeiture of $625.00 pay per month for 75 days is contrary to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(2) which requires that a sentence to forfeitures shall state the exact amount in whole dollars to be forfeited each month, and the number of months the forfeitures will last. We agree and will reassess the sentence.

The findings of guilty are affirmed. Reassessing the sentence based upon the error noted and the entire record, only so much of the sentence is affirmed as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 75 days, forfeiture of $426.00 pay per month for two months and reduction to Private E-l.

Senior Judge PAULEY and Judge KENNETT concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perry, 24 M.J. 557, 1987 CMR LEXIS 227 (usarmymilrev 1987).

24 M.J. 557 (United States v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Williams
40 M.J. 216 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1994)
United States v. Joseph
36 M.J. 846 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1993)
United States v. Randle
35 M.J. 789 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1992)
United States v. Frye
33 M.J. 1075 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1992)
United States v. Simmons
33 M.J. 883 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1991)
United States v. Guerrero
25 M.J. 829 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1988)
United States v. Mullens
24 M.J. 745 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1987)