United States v. Perkins

584 F. App'x 73
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2014·No. No. 14-6706·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to relieve of judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5) & (6) of the FRCivP.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2014). We further deny Perkins’ motions and supplemental motions “to classify civil action as a class action,” “for appeals conference,” and to appoint counsel. We dis[74] pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perkins, 584 F. App'x 73 (4th Cir. 2014).

584 F. App'x 73 (United States v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.