United States v. Perkins

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 8, 2011
• Docket: 10-6019
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner – Appellee,

v.

VICTOR PERKINS,

Respondent – Appellant.

No. 10-6834

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-BR)

Submitted: January 27, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Victor Perkins appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to discontinue his psychotropic medication

and a subsequent order revoking his conditional release. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 10, 2009 & June 1, 2010). We further deny Perkins’ pending

motions to subpoena his medical and psychiatric records, to

“certify civil action as a class action,” for summary judgment,

for declaratory judgment, and to establish a funding program to

compensate him for the wrongful civil commitment. We deny as

moot Perkins’ motion for release pending appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED