United States v. Perkins

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Perkins

285 F. App'x 703

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 28, 2008

DocketNo. 08-10350

StatusPublished

This text of 285 F. App'x 703 (United States v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Perkins, 285 F. App'x 703 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robin Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Perkins, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that the record does not contain any potentially meritorious issues for appeal, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM Perkins’s conviction and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robin Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Perkins, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that the record does not contain any potentially meritorious issues for appeal, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM Perkins’s conviction and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 F. App'x 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perkins-ca11-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack