United States v. Perez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F.4th 437
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2024·No. 23-10772·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-10772 Document: 45-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10772 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 7, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ramon Eulalejo Perez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-252-2 ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Perez has moved to with- draw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10772 Document: 45-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2024

No. 23-10772

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Perez (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)