United States v. Perez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 F.3d 323
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2003·No. 01-20906·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-20906 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FEDERICO PEREZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-43 --------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Trude K. Scott, the attorney appointed to represent Federico

Perez, Jr., on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Our review of counsel’s brief and Perez’s response and

our independent review of the record show that there are no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-20906 -2-

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Perez (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)