United States v. Perez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 1999
Docket98-40601
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Perez (United States v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Perez, (5th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40601 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO PEREZ, SR., also known as Edwardo Perez, also known as Edward Jenks Perez,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-97-C-165-1 - - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Irma M. Sanjines, court-appointed counsel for Eduardo Perez,

Sr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez did

not file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.1

1 The motion of Albert A. Pena, III, to withdraw his Anders brief is also GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perez-ca5-1999.