United States v. Perez
76 M.J. 71, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 157
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 25, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0128/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 71 (United States v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Perez, 76 M.J. 71, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 157 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20160256. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER JUDGE JAMES W. HERRING, JUDGE ON THE COURT OF MILITARY COMMISSION REVIEW, WAS STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO SIT ON THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AND EVEN IF HE WAS STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED TO BE ASSIGNED TO THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, WHETHER HIS SERVICE ON BOTH COURTS VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE. GIVEN HIS NEWLY ATTAINED STATUS AS A SUPERIOR OFFICER.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 71, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perez-armfor-2017.